- #Why is capture one pro 12 runnign slow skin
- #Why is capture one pro 12 runnign slow software
- #Why is capture one pro 12 runnign slow professional
i've used it on a couple of other paying jobs, again, time is of the essence.
i bought the sdq for its resolution and lack of artifacting, at which it excels. Mostly what i need to do is check detail, wb, crop and deliver tiff/jpg. for my own work perhaps, but when i have 30 or so artworks to shoot and get out asap, the long and winding road gets to be very tiring -( Ushere park70 - been there, done that, still doing it lawrence - i wish i had the time. it's turning out to be too time-consuming - and i've given up on sfd not only because of time constraints both taking and post, but the end result requires too much tweaking - and for my requirements isn't warranted.ĭng's won't open in dxo, nor can i get the 30mm lens correction in it (not that it needs much), but i tried capture one and though it looks like another learning curve, it has lens correction and accepts dng's.Īnd of course, dng to capture one is much faster from every angle (well other than ooc jpg -)) Even Capture Two fails to satisfy.Īnyone using such a combination? thoughts?Īt present i've tried all camera options, usually ending up with x3f > spp > tiff 16 bit > dxo. Searching for other answers in the jungle is promising but usually pointless.
#Why is capture one pro 12 runnign slow software
The advantages of this method are: excellent processing using normal tools ability to produce a good global image which you can process further in any other image processing software if you want to adjust specific areas and the overall best results. Take a picture which is saved as a X3F file - Process slowly and well and SPP - process further in your favourite image processing software.
Why ACDSee did not implement them in two years? You have my answer.Why not just find within thee a bit of patience and accept the given path? The link has more suggestions but this two are included in most competitors and all the photographers I know use them as an important part of their workflow. Something similar than the export option (which has a bug as explained here: ). Size, Resolution, Colour space and Bit depth in the save as option of the Develop Mode. Colour adjustment in the Develop Brush of the Develop Mode.Ģ. To better clarify my point, there are two significant features:ġ. The Chevy vs Ferrari comparison is a sign of this, you get similar results with COP, but its vendor did the things right to be considered this way. Thank you for your comments, indeed the best ASDSee's asset is its community, this is why I was troubled so see how we were not heard.Īctually, ACDSee Pro/Ultimate as product were not bad, at least two years ago, the source of the problem is their management, as a result, they did not evolve as the current leaders did. Neither the speed is so different, ACDSee Pro/Ultimate launches faster because it deploys permanently a bunch of files in your system, but once Capture One Pro 10 is running, it seems faster with big files.Ĭapture One Pro 10 has more good things as well as some bad ones, but it has what I expected from ACDSee Pro/Ultimate since two years ago, so, good luck, I am out. The ACDSee Actions are similar to COP Styles, once you save the changes in an image, you can implement them in others, including crops, layers, labels in the database, etc. This is also an advantage for the COP equivalent to the Light IQ (which is only an interface to the tone curve), because in ACDSee Pro/Ultimate such does not work in the Develop Brush of the Develop Mode. The Adjustment Layers in COP work as the Develop Brush from Ultimate, except it has a "single mode" with a single file and all the functionalities available all the time, instead of a Develop with limited options and Edit with a different type of file.
#Why is capture one pro 12 runnign slow skin
The same I experienced before with Canvas, which was the best DTP software and now is almost dead.Ĭapture One Pro 10 (COP) does have the Adjustment Layers, Light IQ and ACDSee Actions (Scripts) and Skin tune functionalities but implemented in a different way, actually it is better. I wrote this post because I am indeed unhappy for wasting my time and money in a product with bad direction.
#Why is capture one pro 12 runnign slow professional
Then I found Capture One Pro 10 has implemented most of those suggestions, it looks more focused to professional workflows and as a result, during those two years, it has become the facto competitor against LightRoom and Darkable, while ACDSee Pro/Ultimate the leader in Views: Only a few bug fixes can be seen until now:Īdditionally, the new features were not required by anybody and are buggy: Here is a list of suggestions made two years ago. I changed because ACDSee barely takes care of the users needs.